On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 16:12, Christian wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Jonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Got slightly bad news for you, The *istD has a problem with TTL flash > > metering. > > It does? I have not had problems with flash photography with mine.... It is reported he combination used at 100ASA underexposes, and on 800 and higher overexposes. I noticed the underexposure at 200ASA myself. At least one stop. I can confirm it works a lot better at 400ASA with my Metz 40MZ-2/SCA3701 combination.
> > > It tends to be off about 1 or more stops with any TTL flash. > > 1 or more? That's pretty vague... Over or under? > > > It is also speculated on that the AF360FGZ with > > P-TTL works better than any other TTL flash. > > This is what I use most of the time. Bounced, straight on, dark subject, > light subjects, macro (inches from the subject), ISO 200 - 1600, fill-in for > subject ranging from close up to far away, whatever... I'm not concerened. > > > We're waiting for a TTL bug fix in the next firmware update from Pentax. > > We are? I'm waiting for a better version of the photo browser and Photo > Laboratory. I am, but a better version of the photo browser is also welcome, and a photoshop and photoalbum plugin for the raw format. > > Christian -- Frits W�thrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
