Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
> 
> Not intolerance.  It is just ambiguous.  Again, not something you would see,
> but take for instance when in Belize the term Americans was for North,
> Central, and South...

Exactly my point. . .

Thanks Cesar, keith
 
> Just some idle time on my hands,
> 
> Cesar
> Panama City, Florida
> 
> -- -----Original Message-----
> -- From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -- Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 3:11 PM
> --
> -- Not to say, Republic of Mexico; Mexico, and Mexicans for
> -- short. Dominion of
> -- Canada; Canada, and Canadians for short. As it happens there
> -- are a lot of United
> -- States in the world, but only one of them is the United
> -- States (political
> -- description) of America (location description).
> --
> -- I see no reason for me, or you (that's a plural you), to
> -- feel guilt for others'
> -- intolerance. In my opinion when ever someone yells bigot he
> -- is telling us more
> -- about himself than about the one he is accusing, after all
> -- he is the one who
> -- thinks some other group is no good.
> --
> -- --
> --
> -- Paul Stenquist wrote:
> --
> -- > It has nothing to do with Hubris. It's the name of the
> -- country: United States
> -- > of America. or America for short. The continent is North
> -- America, and we're all
> -- > North Americans.
> -- >
> -- > Keith Whaley wrote:
> -- >
> -- >
> -- >>As a US citizen, that has always bothered me.
> -- >>To call those citizens of the U.S. of A. "Americans" seems
> -- to be great
> -- >>hubris, especially when it's them saying it, and patently
> -- ignores the
> -- >>fact that there are other Americans, both north and south
> -- of the Canal Zone.
> -- >>I suppose it's like coke in lieu of Coca Cola. In spite of
> -- CC's lawyers,
> -- >>common usage makes it acceptable, if not legal. . .
> -- >>Nevertheless, the feeling remains.
> -- >>
> -- >>keith whaley
> -- >>
> -- >>Steve Desjardins wrote:
> -- >>
> -- >>>I was looking through Shutterbug yesterday and noticed
> -- that 3 of the
> -- >>>6(?) photographers they were interviewing where referred
> -- to as "North
> -- >>>Americans", not Americans or Canadians.  I have noticed
> -- this elsewhere.
> -- >>>Is this usage becoming common?  From what I have seen,
> -- this does not
> -- >>>seem to include Mexicans although this certainly spoils
> -- my sense of
> -- >>>geography.
> -- >>>
> -- >>>I'm not complaining about anything, just curious. This is the only
> -- >>>international group with which I can discuss such things.
> --  The UN won't
> -- >>>return my Emails :-(
> -- >>>
> -- >>>Steven Desjardins
> -- >>>Department of Chemistry
> -- >>>Washington and Lee University
> -- >>>Lexington, VA 24450
> -- >>>(540) 458-8873
> -- >>>FAX: (540) 458-8878
> -- >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -- >
> -- >
> -- >
> --
> -- --
> -- graywolf
> -- http://graywolfphoto.com
> --
> -- "You might as well accept people as they are,
> -- you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
> --
> --

Reply via email to