What I was doing John was to encourage Arnie to continue his experiment, nothing more.
It's your opinion that the blurring of the vehicle detracts from the image. I think it makes a stronger, more realistic image. Anyway, he said he wanted to experiment and practice what he was doing ... John Francis wrote: > > With all due respect, Shel - you're talking through your hat. > > We don't tell you how to do candid street photography; > why are you trying to tell us how to photograph moving vehicles? > (And, especially, moving vehicles at night; a very tricky area). > > Arnie doesn't, as yet, have the experience necessary to pan-track > a vehicle over 1/4 of a second (I'm not sure *I've* got that). > it's obvious what he's going for - the background tracks of a > long exposure tell the story of motion. But blurring the detail > of the car detracts from the image;
