I just did some quick math on the HP 42S and it works out to about 16 rolls of film
that i
would be
shooting at a standard horse show weekend.I do 8-10 shows a year"that are on the books"
and a few
that are not.
So i would say i'm in the 140-160 rolls a year,plus my own personal stuff,(another15-20
colour and 15-
20 B&W)so digital was the way to go for me.
No more mailing proofs etc.They come see me now.lol
Dave(testing the D2H and *istD this weekend)Brooks
BTW prints on the P-400 look nice,at 2.7mp so 4.1 and or 6mp should be way better:-)
>Bruce said > Hello Boris,
>
> Didn't sound like a rant, just common sense. Another way to state it,
> is if you don't shoot more than 140 rolls of film per year, then
> a DSLR is probably not cost justifiable. There are certainly other
> features about that one might want to consider, but on the money/value
> front, those who shoot ALOT, probably can justify it and those who
> don't, probably can't.
> Best regards,
> Bruce
>
