I'm not Mark, but it's 4:20am here. chris
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Robert Gonzalez wrote: > Mark, are you really up at 3:59AM (thats the time your message is > stamped)? Or is your clock set to AM instead of PM? > > rg > > > Mark Roberts wrote: > > Robert Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>As others have mentioned, cost is not always justification for getting a > >>DSLR. But if someone wants to go that route, then there are other > >>"intangibles" that can be considered "cost". For example, what is the > >>value of being able to switch ISO or white balance on the fly? > > > > > > Stop right there. I've just (yesterday and today) been working on a > > project shot under fluorescent light. Various types. With various > > amounts of incandescent and daylight mixed in. > > > > The answer for me (for the white balance part alone) is "priceless". > > Throw in the low noise ISO 800 option (I shot ISO 400 film and it still > > wasn't really fast enough - and I hate ISO 800 film) and I'm sold. > > > > > >
