In that case why not use exposure compensation? ;-) ----- Original Message ----- From: Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 2:53 PM Subject: Re: A question about the Mz-S...
> Kinda, but Manual Control is all about disagreeing with the camera's > estimation of > the light conditions. > > At 10:04 PM 2/11/04, you wrote: > >I don't own a MZ-S but I can't see what all the fuss is about. Can't you > >can change the speed/aperture to any desired value by simply turning the > >thumbwheel? > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 7:09 PM > >Subject: Re: A question about the Mz-S... > > > > > > > Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >At 08:28 AM 2/12/2004 +1000, you wrote: > > > > > > > >>Does this mean that all of these new lenses without aperture rings are > > > >>unusable on the MZ-S? > > > > > > > >Useable in program and shutter priority only. > > > > > > Also note that "all those new lenses" is only three lenses, one of > > > which, the DA 16-45, isn't intended for any film camera (though it > > > supposedly works fine from 20mm up). > > > > > > -- > > > Mark Roberts > > > Photography and writing > > > www.robertstech.com > > > > > I drink to make other people interesting. > -- George Jean Nathan >
