I like looking folks' photos, I do not enjoy reading a bunch of "You should have taken the photo I would have taken if I had been there" critiques, like the smart assed one I did on your photo the other day. In my defense, I can at least say, I was joking.

I think that if one is going to discuss a photo, it should be that photo which is discussed, not some imaginary other possible, or maybe impossible, photo.

Oh, what the heck, I am used to being on a different wavelength than most folks.

--

frank theriault wrote:

Also, I think Steve Jolly's idea of prefixing the subject line with PAW makes eminently good sense. That way, those who not only don't want to participate by posting, but who don't want to enjoy the works of others, can filter the stuff out from the get go - although why anyone wouldn't want to look at photos on a photography list is beyond me! <vbg - just joking - don't jump on me for this one if you're one of the "not interested" folks>


--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com

"You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway."




Reply via email to