Tom, Keep on with your ideas. I agree with you. I like to present my photos as to what they are in full frame. Let you talk of cropping at that point. Perchance there was no other way I could take it other than cropping... I have too many cameras to keep track of how much is added to the viewfinder...
To be quite honest, I enjoyed our time together at GFMtn especially before anyone else showed up. Though, you did catch me off guard when you got technical. Remember that I had driven most of the night to get there. Looking forward to this year's NPW, Cesar Panama City, Florida -----Original Message----- From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 11:55 AM I like looking folks' photos, I do not enjoy reading a bunch of "You should have taken the photo I would have taken if I had been there" critiques, like the smart assed one I did on your photo the other day. In my defense, I can at least say, I was joking. I think that if one is going to discuss a photo, it should be that photo which is discussed, not some imaginary other possible, or maybe impossible, photo. Oh, what the heck, I am used to being on a different wavelength than most folks. -- frank theriault wrote: > > Also, I think Steve Jolly's idea of prefixing the subject line with PAW > makes eminently good sense. That way, those who not only don't want to > participate by posting, but who don't want to enjoy the works of others, > can filter the stuff out from the get go - although why anyone wouldn't > want to look at photos on a photography list is beyond me! <vbg - just > joking - don't jump on me for this one if you're one of the "not > interested" folks> -- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com "You might as well accept people as they are, you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
