frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also #1 has those people in the close background. In #2
they're farther in
> the background - it's great that they're there, because they
provide the
> context of a street scene. But, in #1 they're so close that
they are a bit
> of a distraction, IMHO.
Hi Frank,
That's probably where I find the #2 less interesting: the dark
people going to the right contrast very well with the man's face
pointed to the left.
I'm not sure about the expression in #1; being ambiguous is not
bad, in my opinion.
> In number two, there's light at the end of the street, which
brightens up
> the whole image, and is much more pleasing to me.
Here I agree. A bit more airy.
> So, to summarize, #2 is my favourite.
Thanks a lot for commenting, Frank.
Ciao,
Gianfranco
PS: the pup in your pic is lovely!
=====
�To read is to travel without all the hassles of luggage.�
---Emilio Salgari (1863-1911)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
