I've always try to give my ideas as to how an image can be improved, wither is compositionally or technically. As far as the subject material goes - well I generally leave that alone. Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PAW - seated @ 1/4
> I finally have it figured, you guys are all frustrated would be editors. > > I often see photos that I wouldn't have taken, but I always feel that is because > my vision is different from the person's who took it, and not that my way is > better. I can see giving technical advice, but everytime someone posts a photo, > there are a bunch of folks that jump in and say you should have made a different > photo. That is a bunch of crap. > > In this case the crop is no better, nor worse than the original, it is just a > different vision. At least a real editor would have had the saving grace of > doing it to fit the picture in a different sized space. > > -- > > Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/robs-pic.jpg > > > > With bottom and top cropped. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > >>I'd crop off the bottom, a little above that tiny yellowish spot on the > >>right. All that black on the bottom is just dead space that isn't doing anything, > >>ergo, contributing nothing to the scene. > > > > > > > > -- > graywolf > http://graywolfphoto.com > > "You might as well accept people as they are, > you are not going to be able to change them anyway." > > >
