Seeing how there have been several comments on having the bride look
up rather than down, I have posted to the same web page, the other
version of this basic pose with her looking up.

You can see both images and let me know if you think the second image
is more to your liking.

Here is the page again:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/paw.html

Thanks for the feedback so far.  Certainly this type of shot is not
one you want more than one or two per wedding.  It does make the price
of a soft focus lens be pretty high for the number of shots it would
be used for.

In my present equipment situation, I don't have a soft focus lens
anymore.  In the 67 format, the 120mm was a good compromise focal
length.  In 35mm, Pentax has a 28 or 85.  For *istD, neither is very
ideal.


-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Tuesday, February 24, 2004, 5:35:31 PM, you wrote:

Eac> In a message dated 2/24/2004 4:27:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
Eac> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eac> Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ok, here is my first one.
>> 
>> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/paw.html

Eac> Very nice, Bruce!

Eac> Bet they liked it. The only thing I'd want different is to have her looking
Eac> up -- I'd like to see her eyes.

Eac> A wedding shot should be romantic and it has a soft, romantic feel -- the
Eac> combination of the luminous light and the soft focus. Very romantic. ;-)

Eac> Marnie aka Doe  



Reply via email to