John wrote:
JF> In the extreme, maybe. But the big limitation is still that there is
JF> only one independent measurement made at every pixel center (the '*'s),
JF> which constrains the high-frequency response of the scanning array to
JF> around that of a true 1700dpi scanner. If HP use more of the total
JF> silicon area for their sensor than Fuji do for theirs that will help
JF> with reducing high-frequency noise by eliminating some aliasing, but
JF> it doesn't help with resolution.
Agreed. Besides, by having 6 sensor arrays instead of 3, HP faces
harder constraints on alignment requirements. Have they taken
additional precautions like extended interpolation? It puzzles me why
the 4 pixels banding instead of 2? I guess this might be the answer.
Servus, Alin
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
