OK, I'll throw another hint. You cant get grainless scans this big with 35mm film in black and white, let alone color. It is not 35mm film.
JCO ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Andre Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 2:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Name that capture? >Not a pretty shot but the image quality is up there: >http://jcoconnell.com/temp/macro01s.jpg > >Film or digital?, lens? Cost of equipment? >Anyone care to guess? > >JCO This could be from one of your setting with an enlarging lens (reversed?) on a 35mm film camera. One of the best way to do macro. If this is the case, the cost of an old enlarging lens should be under $40. Andre
