Re: Name that capture?

[graywolf]

Well, it points up one thing. A 400KB image is a great leveler. Doesn't much 
matter what it was shot with, it would look about the same. Now 150MB v. 18MB 
you may well notice a difference. Of course digital is everybit as good as film. 
On the computer screen (grin).

I too would guess 4x5 with tilt, only because of the apparent DOF.

--

John Coyle wrote:

This one's got dust on it, so I'd guess film - maybe your 5x4 with some
incline on the front standard, as there is good DOF through the centre of
the subject?  Don't know enough to guess the lens, but I recall someone,
perhaps you, talking about having picked up a new and very cheap lens
standard a little while ago.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: Name that capture?



Here's a much bigger version of the file for a better "hint" :

http://jcoconnell.com/temp/macro01m.jpg

JCO

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  J.C. O'Connell   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://jcoconnell.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Film or digital?, lens? Cost of equipment?
Anyone care to guess?
JCO

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  J.C. O'Connell   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://jcoconnell.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--



--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html