On 24/4/04, MARKUS, discombobulated, offered: >that's an interesting point for me: Where is the crossing line for >manipulating photos? And has there to be one? >Times where a photo was a proof are long gone. >I feel already like cheating a bit if I change anything on a photo, even >cropping. I don't know why.... actually. >I will answer more on your comments later
I believe there is a line in the sand, but it is only known to each photographer personally. Don't forget that manipulation of photographic images has been going on since photography was first invented. Dodging and burning in a darkroom is a direct descendant of digital manipulation. For me, the finished print (I don't shoot slides) is all that matters. Take it or leave it. How I got there is nobody's business except mine. I live with my own personal demons ! Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _____________________________
