Bruce Dayton wrote: > > Ann, > > Based on your comments and a few others, I have re-scanned this image > and "fiddled" just a bit. The sky can't be darkened much without > making it look pretty bad (probably 8/16 bit type of problem or just > blown out), so I have cropped some to improve that. The new scan also has > more accurate color - at least on my calibrated monitor here. Along > with that, the shadows are not blocked up, so you can see a bit more > detail there. You can compare to the first one by clicking the next > hotspot above the picture. > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0127-80a.htm
Don't know quite why _ but I couldnt get there just now - might just be my browser being cranky... drat... > > I'm not quite sure I follow you about "Would like to see it titled on > your web page" - could you elaborate just a bit. > > Thanks, > > Bruce > Oh, simply that I'd like to see a place name or subject line under the image on that page. Bryce Canyon in winter or something... I thought at first it was Cedar Breaks, actually I know you identified it in the email but if someone was on that page who was not on list they wouldnt know ann
