"Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Fortunately the density of the data off cameras such as the *ist D is so smooth >pixel to pixel (particularly when sharpening is set to low) that it's >impossible to tell the difference between TIFF and minimum JPG out for the >camera. This is why you will hear so many people claim that saving TIFF in >camera is a waste of time (I agree completely).
This is my experience also: There's no detectable difference between Minimum-compression JPEG and TIFF right out of the camera. >It's either JPG or RAW for me and RAW offers so much more control of contrast, >the camera generated JPG files are surprisingly good. Yep. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
