No problem. Thinking about Pentax business motives is enough to make you bite the dog.
Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458-8878 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/24/04 05:40PM >>> I wrote: > > Certainly they need mass-produced articles. But as any > > other better camera producer they don't just sell > > stand-alone products, they do sell camera systems > > (including a range of cameras from high-end to basic > > level). Will they support a full-range system in the > > future ? A full-range system includes niche-products. > > OK, this is what you will do, if you were Pentax. This is also what I would > have done in the past, if I was Pentax (a high end film SLR is not the niche > product I'd market today). If Pentax was Pentax, as it is, they often did > hard to explain moves, half-moves, contradicting moves. > I'm trying to understand what Pentax will do (and could reasonably do), not > what anybody within PDML think Pentax should do. Re-reading my words, they feel rather harsh to me, especially the last sentence. That was not my intention, as I only tried to be straight and clear. So, I apologize for such a possible unintentional taste. All the best, Dario Bonazza
