----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Subject: photography vs cameras

>
> A lighter load, more shots before reloading, and better lens
options?
> Presumably 35mm was adopted because it either gave users more good
shots,
> or an equal number of adequately good shots for less weight and
cost.
> Digital is taking over for the same reasons.

And don't forget poorer image quality, in fact image quality so poor
that any schmuck with a few hundred dollars to spend can do as well.

>
> Switching to MF or LF might make me more "elite", but it sure
wouldn't
> help me do my job.

Depends on your job. If you are on of the 1/10 of 1%, then no, but
for the rest of the pro boys, that larger negative can't help but
help.

>
> Pro gear, even 35mm, is still outrageously expensive compared to a
minimal
> competant camera rig, and most folks haven't got anything like it.
There
> are shots that you can get with a 600 or 14 that you just can't get
with
> a 35-70.

But thats the 1/10 of 1% category, which is the one that everyone
wannabe, which is why Nikon and Canon sells so many F5's and EOS 1s
to people that could just as well do with a Rebel or F60, but almost
no one is actually in the group.
So few as to be statistically non existent.

I venture that probably 95% of "professional photography" could be
done with a 35-70 zoom.

>
> Photography is, of course, more than technical details.  Content
matters,
> and in most cases this requires more than "f8 and be there".

Of course it is, but it is the technical details that seperated the
real pros from the weekend warriors. Cameras that take away the need
to be technically proficient means that just about anyone can be a
pro.
Take away the things that seperate the pros from the weekend warriors
and the lines blur into non existence.
Take away the big negative, and you don't have an advantage over the
school teacher who wants to earn an extra few dollars on the weekend
shooting weddings.
In fact, the teacher has a real advantage, since he doesn't depend on
photography for a living, and he can undercut the pros to the point
that the market is ruined.
It happened where I live, and I am sure it has happened in a lot of
other places as well.
It's not like brain surgery where you actually have to know
something.
All you have to do is have a working eye and you can be a pro. No
technical knowledge needed.

And that is why professional photographers don't get much respect.

William Robb


Reply via email to