Holy cow, I'm bummed that I missed the original message here... anyone care to send it along? CW
----- Original Message ----- From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 2:14 AM Subject: Mazdas vs cameras > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "mike wilson" > Subject: OT: Re: photography vs cameras > > > > > > > They are OK if you rate them properly, ie at three times their stated > > capacity.... > > Is it 3 times or 6 times? They are, after all, closer to being a two stroke > cycle to a four stroke...... > I had a 1972 RX-2 which had the factory hot rod engine. The stock 12A put > out some 135 HP, mine was apparently somewhat more powerful, at 170 HP. > So I was told, anyway. > You needed a pretty hot 350 to beat my RX2 in a street light drag race. > I had a 2 door from 1973 for some years after that car met a rather > ignonimous end. It was no where near as fast, and wouldn't start if the > temperature was below freezing, which was most annoying, living where I > live, and all. > The four door had better aerodynamics, I think. The two door had the > annoying tendency to try to leave the ground above 100mph. > > William Robb > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.700 / Virus Database: 457 - Release Date: 6/6/2004
