Jens,
I have noticed this too. I dont think pro-labs help much either, it depends on the lab. Personally I have found a lab near me that works for me and just stick with them. I get the impression that with the move to digital, the old optical process is not getting the attention it deserves. Perhaps it is a skills shortage, or most likely people cant be bothered to do a good job. My opinions. Feel free to differ at will.
A.
On 12 Jun 2004, at 12:26, Jens Bladt wrote:
I need to make a withdrawal from the PDML wisdom bank, please.
I am getting the impression, that is is getting harder to get decent film
development these days. Is this true? I know my digital images are very
sharp due to the smaller format/better DOF. But I also know that film images
can be extreemly sharp as well. But I'm getting bad films back from my small
dealers lab these days.
Is this a common tendency?
Which films are the sharpest (200-1600 ASA) today (135 and 120) ? Do we have to send our films to pro labs to get decent result? All the best Jens
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
