... and I might wait for the new baby *ist D this autumn - like the D70 it might even be better (image quality) than some more expensive models! I guess Pentax has to do something about the sharpness issue, which a lot of reviews (and some PDML'ers) seem to be complaining about.
'Hmmm.... I might jsut do that - except I don't have a *ist D. (I bought a MZ-Z, a scanner and a SONY DSC F717 (appr. same cost as a *ist D body) instead. Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 12. juni 2004 12:46 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: Film and Development shoot some ISO 50 print film and compare the results when processed in a professional lab with your *istD results. be sure you are comparing prints at the same sizes. Herb... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 6:26 AM Subject: Film and Development > I need to make a withdrawal from the PDML wisdom bank, please. > I am getting the impression, that is is getting harder to get decent film > development these days. Is this true? I know my digital images are very > sharp due to the smaller format/better DOF. But I also know that film images > can be extreemly sharp as well. But I'm getting bad films back from my small > dealers lab these days. > Is this a common tendency?
