Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> 
> Hi Ann,
> 
> It took a second viewing, after my morning tea, to see the subtlety of this
> shot.  I like it.  However, I think that the heavy black border around it
> is too much, and that a thinner black border won't compete as much with the
> image.  Also, the white background that comes up on my browser doesn't help
> the presentation much, either.  A neutral, middle grey, would be
> advantageous, imo. I sincerely believe that all too often not enough time
> and thought is given to the photo's presentation.  OK, off my soap box now
> before the tomatoes come flying.

On my screen it isn't a white background ... I
have my WIndoze options set
to exactly a neutral gray, btw...  I can't look at
a white screen with my eyes.
I like the black border at this width myself.  I'm
sending jpgs not htmls so
you can color the background anyway you like.

What is really funny is that I just came back to
the apt after an outing - the ONLY
other piece of mail I read before this one was on
my Scrabble list where someone
made a really silly pun and signed off "Ducking
the rotten tomatoes" !

> 
> That said, good catch.  I like many of your photos just for the fact that I
> have to "get into them" a bit to fully appreciate the work.  You make me
> work to see the less obvious, which is a Good Thing.

thanks, I like to think so.

> 
> WRT the comment (by someone) that the driver's face would enhance the photo
> if the driver was looking at the camera: Nope, don't think so. There's a
> subtle dynamic going on that requires contact between the driver and the
> scowling poster face.  I think too many people look for the obvious.

I'd lighten the face a bit to se it more clearly.

> 
> Sure, it may have been a grab shot, a lucky catch, but you recognized what
> was going on upon seeing what was in the finder, or afterwards, upon
> looking at the print or the neg.

I was lucky the guy in the car - and that car -
showed up.  We could start a 
discussion on what a grab shot is :)  I"d define
it as a photo taken quickly the
minute the photog sees what he wants and has to
shoot fast to record it before
it disappears.  Different, I think, than the linkd
of lucky shot that someone gets,
say, in a crowd watching an event where the photog
really cant see what he is getting
because he isnt looking through the lens but
shooting blind form the hip or over heads.

> 
> Anyway, cool shot.  I like how clean and neat the street seems, too.
> 
> Shel
> 
Thanks -  re street clean - ya know I didn't take
it in New York ! :)

happy Sunday
ann


> > http://users.rcn.com/annsan/pittsburghjune17.jpg

Reply via email to