Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
BD> My screen resolution is 1400 X 1050 on a 16" LCD. The reason I state BD> that is because when I look at the pic I see "One dot, another dot, BD> and the city" - I really can't make out the man or his dog other than BD> two small blobs. Maybe a bigger image would help.
Oh! I have 1152x864 on 17" CRT. In my case blobs are tad bigger <g>...
Well, I do agree with you though <g>.
BD> I do like how you framed the buildings through the trees. I'm BD> guessing I would like the overall concept if I could see the subjects.
Funny thing is that I had both 24 mm and 35 mm with me at that time. I looked at 24 mm and thought to me - this is way too wide. Apparently 35 mm is not narrow either...
All in the point of view, Boris...
Did you specifically intend to "feature" the man and dog? Or, were they incidental to the scene?
If what you intended to portray WAS the man and dog, you should have used your 135mm! Or your 200mm!
On the other hand, if what you have is all you have as a result of your outing, I'd change the name of the image to Jerusalem Park, or something like that! (Unless it's really in Haifa! <g>)
I can SEE the park and the lovely setting...it all makes sense. I like the shot. But I can't SEE the man or dog as anything but unresolved bits of 'something' in the middle of the park...
keith whaley
I have few films to scan now. So PAWs will be coming...
Thanks!
Boris ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED])
