Tell that to the judge. What do you want to do? Put all the expert witnesses out
of business? "Yer Onner, dis photo shows de difinit's dog bitting de planif."
Grin.
--
Cotty wrote:
On 30/6/04, graywolf, discombobulated, offered:
In the past couple of weeks we have seen several photos which had long
intros.
The thing I noticed about them all is that the long intro led me to expect
something I did not see in the photo. In every case the photos were
capable of
standing on their own, but did not live up to the intro. So my conclusion is
that one should not explain a photo before showing it.
I'll go along with that, and in fact add that I think a photo should
*never* need explaining!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_____________________________
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
