You're right! I guess I was thinking of the 400/2.8 ED. t
On 6/30/04 17:21, John Francis wrote: > > That's not how I read it - he got rid of the 600 lens, but bought a 400. > > >> It looks like he tossed the whole kit! A footnote at the end of the article >> states that the rig was just too awkward for wildlife photography. >> >> t >> >> On 6/30/04 15:27, William Robb wrote: >> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Tim Sherburne" >>> >>> Subject: Re: Something big >>> >>> >>>> >>>> One of the many interesting articles at Luminous Landscape >>> addresses the >>>> practical obstacles when using this combination: >>>> >>>> <http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/600mm.shtml> >>>> >>> >>> I have the same tripod he used. He should have tossed it in favour of >>> a sturdy wood tripod. >>> >>> William Robb >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > >
