Sorry Rob, I don�t buy into this nonsense about Josteins opinion being more valid than anyone else's because he has a website and has written this or that. He has an opinion like anyone else.
A. On 9/7/04 12:08 pm, "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't want to get into a flame war over this, but El Gringo certainly > read as saying that Jostein was imagining these things and/or was too > useless to use the tools involved (software & tripod/camera etc) > properly. If you have a look at what Jostein has on his website and > read some of what he has written here you will easily see that the > suggested 'uselessness' is a load of tosh. And to say that to someone > without taking the time to make even a basic evaluation of the person is > poor. > > The points might be valid in a general sense - but directing them a > Jostein with no justification is not. > > I am still hoping that it is just the way that emails distort the > meaning behind what someone is trying to say. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 09 July 2004 10:57 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: *istD anti-aliasing? >> >> >> Hey Rob, El Gringo wasn't attacking anyone, he was just making some >> valid points about sharpness and the *istD and peoples perception of >> it. A tripod may well help. What is the camera slap like on those >> things? >> >> Antonio Russell >> >> >> >> Rob Brigham wrote: >> >> Know Jostein & his photography well, do you? >> >> It may be a case of the way things read on the internet, but >> you did come across as very nearly attacking Jostein and his >> photography personally - especially with the tripod comment etc. >> >> Don't get me wrong, I hear what you are saying - and I am >> reasonably happy with the istD sharpess through CS too. >> >> But I respect Jostein well enough to listen to what he is >> saying and consider his points. >> >> >
