Yeah, the 10d produces much sharper/nicerimagesIMO. I guess it all comes down to a personal preference. Every tool is different.
Antonio Russell On 9/7/04 12:11 am, "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> And who is right??? ;-) > > :-) > > From a technical pov, it's always hard to argue with the real experts. I > remember that statement from last autumn, and I'm not going to dispute > anything... > > Still, I find the *istD raw files lacking in sharpness, and I believe I know > how to use both the USM in photoshop, and the various sharpening tools > elsewhere. > > For example, the I think PhaseOne C1 Pro gives me slightly sharper tiffs > than the raw converter in photoshop. An both are of course better than the > native Pentax thingy. > > At the same time, I see users of other brands produce images with a > sharpness I am not able to get. Which frustrates me. :-( > > cheers, > Jostein >
