Well, I would agree that that is the only economical way.
I was thinking of this the other day, I would some day like to try my hand with platinum prints. Then I got to thinking, if I do that it would be stupid to put them under glass where you could not see the subtleties of the print.
After I had thought about that for awhile, I came to the conclusion that that applies to most of our photography. Even photo salons and museums show photos under glass, often with poor lighting. How are folks supposed to know what a truly good print looks like when they are prevented from seeing them properly. Oil paintings are not always under glass, but photographs seem to be. How strange?
--
William Robb wrote:
I am convinced that at this point, the only way to get a good black and white print is still the old fashioned way, with film and a darkroom.
-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
