Sorry, that shot was Wendy's taken with the 70-300 APO. I have the 70-300 of a couple of generations before the APO. It's not bad, but it's not wonderful. I took this with it. http://www.sunny16.net/photos/paw/2004-07-06.html
> -----Original Message----- > From: Lon Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 6:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: why i haven't switched to canon > > > Amita, that shot is way weaker than I get with the > Sigma 70-300 APO at 300, wide open, on film. I feel > your pain. > > Amita Guha wrote: > >>Here's one example (excuse the poor composition) > >>http://www.pbase.com/image/31458299/large > >>I uploaded the > >>original file in all its glory (2.3M) > >>You may be disappointed if you're planning on using your > >>100-300 with the > >>istD. At 300 anyway. At 200 it doesn't seem too bad. > >>Going to try out the 80-320 tomorrow, see what I get. > > > > > > So how did it go? I'm looking for a lens in that range and I'm > > interested in the 80-320. > > > > Amita > > >
