Hi!
Well I thought it was about time for me particularly after the recent threads. Back to practicality, note the extensive out of control depth of field in my PAW image produced using the *ist D and A50/2.8 Macro at f8:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2541857&size=sm
Rob, this one of yours does not do much to me. It is competent technically I think, but this is where it ends. This is "yet another" such picture that I am seeing.
What strikes me interesting is that it is clearly a digital image. There is something creamy, something a bit strange about the way the flowers are rendered... In my understanding it is because it was shot on *istD. Please notice that this is mere statement of the fact. It is neither critique nor praise.
Thanks.
Boris
