--- Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2541857&size=lg > > Thanks for that. Does anyone actually think the > recent changes at Photo.net > equate to improvement?
No. But they amount to changes... What I don't like, is the way that ratings are no longer ascribed to those doing the rating. There were already enough weasels who took some amount of joy in giving very low ratings to very good photos; now they can do it with impunity. And, it goes both ways: if someone rates a photo of mine highly, I like to know who it is, you know, so I can bribe them for next time <g>. And, I guess that each individual photo page looks cleaner now, but you've got to click the mouse one more time to get the image info. I'd think that "if it ain't broke, don't fix it", but some web designer out there has to justify his existence (and paycheque) with this redesign, I guess. cheers, frank ===== "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
