No, he won't get the point Rob, but I do. Tks. Norm
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 20 Jul 2004 at 12:10, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
So you see my point then, that is unless you think that that particular image has excessive DOF of course. I put that image up to exemplify the fact that even at f9 (sorry it wasn't actually f8) the DOF at the image plane can still be minuscule even using a 50mm lens and the background (which was less than 1m away) was blurred beyond recognition. I couldn't have got 1% of the subject in recognizable focus at f2.8.
