hehe, don't we all?!?! However, the fact remains, that the financial benefits received by myself, are completely incongruous to the amount of photographic fortitude that I expel, and therefore, I am forced to accept that my talents are nothing more than soporific. I do, however, possess this innate sense of indomitability, that results in me continuing on my perpetual path to photographic enlightenment, and hopefully, one day, prosperity may even ensue.
thanks to Roget's Descriptive Word Finder for this ridiculously verbose paragraph. lol! hey, "verbose", there's another cool word... tan. -----Original Message----- From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 7:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film) I wish the remuneration I received for my photography was reciprocal to the effort. Tom C. >From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs >Film) >Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:20:48 -0400 (EDT) > >--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cotty, > > > > You must subcscribe to Merriam-Websters Word-a-Day? > > Bromide was today's > > word. > > > >Actually, I think Cotty has Word a Day Toilet Paper. >Some days he uses, like 10 or 15 big new words. Other >days, none. Depends what he ate the day before... > ><vbg> > >cheers, >frank > >===== >"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The >pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer > >______________________________________________________________________ >Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca >
