The used spelling was indented. :-) nitesoJ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 1:43 AM Subject: RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)
> Did you use the wrong word on porpoise or was it a typicalgraphic error? > > Don > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 5:09 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital > > vs Film) > > > > > > Gee... > > I always try to stay away from words that I'm not component to use. > > Jostein > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 11:52 PM > > Subject: RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: > > Digital vs Film) > > > > > > > > > > hehe, don't we all?!?! > > > > > > However, the fact remains, that the financial benefits received by > > myself, > > > are completely incongruous to the amount of photographic fortitude > > that I > > > expel, and therefore, I am forced to accept that my talents are > > nothing more > > > than soporific. I do, however, possess this innate sense of > > indomitability, > > > that results in me continuing on my perpetual path to photographic > > > enlightenment, and hopefully, one day, prosperity may even ensue. > > > > > > thanks to Roget's Descriptive Word Finder for this ridiculously > > verbose > > > paragraph. lol! > > > > > > hey, "verbose", there's another cool word... > > > > > > tan. > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 7:26 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: > > Digital > > > vs Film) > > > > > > > > > I wish the remuneration I received for my photography was reciprocal > > to the > > > effort. > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: > > Digital vs > > > >Film) > > > >Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:20:48 -0400 (EDT) > > > > > > > >--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cotty, > > > > > > > > > > You must subcscribe to Merriam-Websters Word-a-Day? > > > > > Bromide was today's > > > > > word. > > > > > > > > > > > > >Actually, I think Cotty has Word a Day Toilet Paper. > > > >Some days he uses, like 10 or 15 big new words. Other > > > >days, none. Depends what he ate the day before... > > > > > > > ><vbg> > > > > > > > >cheers, > > > >frank > > > > > > > >===== > > > >"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The > > > >pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer > > > > > > > > > >_____________________________________________________________________ > > _ > > > >Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
