Ryan,

The camera was set to multi-segment metering, but I'm not sure if the
*istD will do that with an A lens and the AF1.7TC. If it doesn't, I
guess it defaults to centre-weight...

Jostein

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Floating leaves


> Good thing about digital! Any chance you'd be able to show the -1
too? Also,
> what about metering?
>
> Regards,
> Ryan
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 1:56 AM
> Subject: Re: PESO - Floating leaves
>
>
> > Hi Ryan,
> >
> > I wasn't sure how the *istD would handle this situation, so I took
> > four exposures from +/-0 to -1 (in thirds) just to learn...
> >
> > When I got them up on the monitor, I realised that all of them
were
> > usable, but that the -1 was closest to what I had in mind.
However, I
> > liked the clouds pattern better on the -0.3, so that's the one I
have
> > used. The raw files always look a bit flat, so I adjusted Curves
for a
> > bit more contrast in PhaseOne C1raw when converting it to TIFF.
> >
> > Thanks for commenting.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jostein
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 3:16 PM
> > Subject: Re: PESO - Floating leaves
> >
> >
> > > Another superb capture- I swear you've got a gifted eye, Jos!
Keep
> > it up.
> > > Btw, how did you go about exposing for that one?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ryan
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 10:54 PM
> > > Subject: PESO - Floating leaves
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The third and last PESO image from my recent holiday:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.oksne.net/paw/lily_leaves.html
> > > >
> > > > Please tell me what you think...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jostein
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to