I too am reasonably satisfied with Nikon 990. As I use it primarily indoors, I
added a bracket and SB-28 flash to the set which, so far, has overcome my
unhappiness with the fill-in flash when the subject is not quite close.
Although I use the digital a lot, but, for me, film still has its advantages
over this 3mp level camera.
Otis Wright
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I don't know about the EI-2000, but I was given a Nikon 990 for an
> anniversary present. It does produce great images. It has replaced my film
> cameras for snapshots of the kids. I scan all my negatives anyway, and this
> saves on cleanup. It still has annoying P&S qualities like major delay on
> shutter tripping, speed of autofocus, weak flash, etc. But the CCD imagers
> are getting quite good. I'm happy having both. I look forward to the day
> when I can afford the digital version of the MZ-S.
>
> Bruce Dayton
> Sacramento, CA
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Evan Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 9:55 AM
> Subject: EI-2000
>
> > I never thought I would say it but I thinking about a digital camera to
> augment
> > my film stuff. I have a friend who swears by her Nikon 990 and produces
> some
> > simply stunning work with it. So has anyone tried the EI-2000? Is it
> worth the
> > price or can someone recommend something else.
> >
> > Evan Hanson
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
