Yeah, I too, still prefer my film cameras for many reasons. That is one
reason I have been hesitant to spring for the SB-28. When I need something
like that, I turn back to my Pentaxes.
Bruce Dayton Sacramento, CA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Otis Wright, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: EI-2000
> I too am reasonably satisfied with Nikon 990. As I use it primarily
indoors, I
> added a bracket and SB-28 flash to the set which, so far, has overcome my
> unhappiness with the fill-in flash when the subject is not quite close.
> Although I use the digital a lot, but, for me, film still has its
advantages
> over this 3mp level camera.
>
> Otis Wright
>
> Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
> > I don't know about the EI-2000, but I was given a Nikon 990 for an
> > anniversary present. It does produce great images. It has replaced my
film
> > cameras for snapshots of the kids. I scan all my negatives anyway, and
this
> > saves on cleanup. It still has annoying P&S qualities like major delay
on
> > shutter tripping, speed of autofocus, weak flash, etc. But the CCD
imagers
> > are getting quite good. I'm happy having both. I look forward to the
day
> > when I can afford the digital version of the MZ-S.
> >
> > Bruce Dayton
> > Sacramento, CA
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Evan Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 9:55 AM
> > Subject: EI-2000
> >
> > > I never thought I would say it but I thinking about a digital camera
to
> > augment
> > > my film stuff. I have a friend who swears by her Nikon 990 and
produces
> > some
> > > simply stunning work with it. So has anyone tried the EI-2000? Is it
> > worth the
> > > price or can someone recommend something else.
> > >
> > > Evan Hanson
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
