Greysolf
I have tried to move the camera away from the eye (an arms length), still
looking into the viewfinders exp. info. By doing so, the shutter speed may
increase from lets say 1/45 sec to 1/60 sec, when the sun is in my back.
This means the camera will underexpose 0.5 stop, compared to the normal
situation, where very little light will enter through the eyepice/ocular
because my head is in the way. This setting will be in operation when
elevate the camera on a pole (monopod). By activaling a memory lock before
removing the camera from my eye, I can lock on to the correct exposure
(measured from the ground level point og view, which may differ from that of
the elevated view). A camera missing a AE lock can be set to maual exposure.

Do you know if the MZ-S is capeable of adjusting exposure DURING exposuere?
Jens

Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 15. august 2004 17:13
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: OT: Manfrotto Monopod enabled (334B)


No it does not affect actual exposure as the mirror blocks that light path
when
it is in the up position. Now some old cameras with deteriated foam may have
a
problem, but there should not be one with any SLR in good condition*.

* Ahem! Except maybe for those with pellix mirrors.

--

Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
>
>
>>under exposure is not acceptable, of course. However, when using the MZ-S,
I
>>don't need to cover the eyepiece. I can just activate the HOLD button, to
>>fix the exposure.
>
>
> I assume that HOLD does the same as exposure lock in the -5n, which is
> the same as metering and setting to Manual mode. I thought the problem
> is not just to do with the metering, but with the exposure itself too.
> Otherwise, what's the point of the eyepiece covers?
>
> Curious,
> Kostas
>
>

--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html




Reply via email to