> Steve Desjardins wrote on 17.08.04 16:11:
> 
> > There are many folks that have enough money to buy a DSLR but really
> > don't want or need the advantages.  For those folks the prosumer cams
> > are a better choice.  These cameras existed for film (remember those
> > Olympus cameras?) but never really caught on.  But with a big enough
> > zoom, they are fine for digital work./  My friends that own things like
> > the Nikon 5700 love them and would never go to an interchangeable lens
> > model.  They just want to take good quality images and not invest in a
> > bunch of lenses.  These cameras do exactly that.  The big changes will
> > be the improvements of the electronic viewfinders.  Once they improve
> > the reaction speed of the display and the color rendition, the SLR-style
> > optical viewfinder will be a thing for enthusiasts and pros.  IMHO, of
> > course ;-)
>

I agree with you!

Fuji's line of prosumer cameras -- the 4900, 6900, S602, S7000, S20 -- seems to 
do well. Each model has a higher-resolution EVF than its predecessor, so 
apparently Fuji also sees that as the most important thing to change. I think 
all of those are still using the same lens. I enjoyed mine (6900) for a couple 
of years and my main frustration was the viewfinder, and the fact that I knew I 
had much better lenses in my cabinet than the one on that camera. But if I 
hadn't already had the collection of good Pentax glass, and if the little Fuji 
hadn't been broken, I might have never gone to the DSLR.

A friend has the S7000 and is very happy with it; she has a Minolta SLR system 
and so no DSLR option for her existing lenses. Another friend is considering 
the S20 (successor to the S7000) because she doesn't want to worry about the 
potential for getting dust on the sensor when changing lenses. (She has Nikon 
lenses already, so may still go for a DSLR.) Someone else I know has upgraded 
from one Fuji camera (the S602) to an S7000, so I am guessing he is not feeling 
the need for an SLR. And I do see people using that style of camera, 
particularly the Fuji models, when I'm out and about.

Earlier in the thread, I agreed that a hotshoe on the new Pentax 750Z would be 
a nice addition, but I've since seen a problem with that idea.It appears from 
the information already presented that the 750Z is about the same size as the 
550/555.  Looking at my 550, it really is too small for a shoe, and this model 
is special because of its *combination* of pocketability, versatility (manual 
control of most functions) and great image quality.

ERN


Reply via email to