----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Dayton" Subject: Re: It's over (was Re: Ilford in trouble? and digi snappers)
> I fully agree with you in regards to quality. Even when I compared my > 67 stuff to 6mp digital, there is clearly more detail in the 67. If I > was shooting scenics and landscapes mostly, I might still be shooting > film. But for closer, frame filling subjects, like weddings and > portraits, the digital is plenty good enough. I wouldn't want to be > carting around a 4X5 for that kind of work. For weddings and portraits, digital is close to ideal. You get the appearance of sharpness, but the really fine detail that annoys the subjects so much just isn't there. William Robb
