On 25 Aug 2004 at 11:54, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > Digital still cant match what you can do with a 4x5 FILM > camera and lens that costs less than a DSLR body alone.
> Im am not trying to say that the average person should be > shooting 4x5 film, I'm just saying for those who know and want > really good quality, there is no affordable digital at this > time or in the near future. That is still the domain of FILM. Do you appreciate that for some of us who have made the decision that 4x5 isn't not for us the problem isn't affordability? You seem to keep hinging your argument on $$$ vs quality. For me it's convenience vs benefit vs need & the clincher: reality. Value for money is secondary in my case. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
