I'm not the Pugmeister, but it's fair game as far as I can see.

Tom C.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lewis, Gerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 1:55 PM
Subject: RE: Gallery Themes


> I agree.  Just a question, what about a Pentax body and non-pentax lens,
or
> a non pentax body (like my Chinon) with one of my Pentax lenses?
>
> Jerry in Houston
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aimcompute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Gallery Themes
>
>
> I personally dislike the lens themes.  I figure though if some individuals
> can occasionally submit images taken with non-Pentax cameras, that I can
> break the theme rules from time to time.
>
> Tom C.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Brogden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 12:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Gallery Themes
>
>
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Norman Baugher wrote:
> >
> > > One of the unfortunate realities of life, is that sometimes it's not
> fair.
> > > Learn to live with it.
> > > Norm
> >
> > Fine.  I propose that we introduce "Snow" and "Prairie" themes.  Hell,
> > let's go all the way and have a "Canadian landscape" theme.  After all,
> > life isn't fair, right?  Like I said, I don't care either way.  There
was
> > a big stink raised on the list earlier over some non-inclusive themes,
so
> > I'm playing the Devil's Advocate and pointing out (as someone already
did
> > earlier) that these particular themes are exculsionary, where the others
> > are not.  There are only two questions to think about here.
> >
> > (1) Are PUG themes supposed to be inclusive or not?  That is, provided
> > that someone has the interest and ability to submit an entry, should the
> > themes themselves be such that anyone can submit, or is it okay to have
> > themes like "Landscapes in Canada" and "Short telephoto (pictures made
> > with lenses in the 70mm to 150mm range)" that would seem to prevent some
> > people from submitting?
> >
> > And (2) if the PUG is supposed to be inclusive, then are wide angle and
> > telephoto themes exclusionary or not?  I'm not saying that they are or
are
> > not.  I'm just suggesting the possibility that they are and am waiting
to
> > see how people feel about it.  So far no one has put forth any
arguments,
> > intelligent or not, to say that they are not exclusionary.  All I've
seen
> > so far are posts saying that life is exclusionary and unfair and that we
> > should shut up and accept it.  If you feel like that, then you obviously
> > don't feel that the regular PUG *themes* are supposed to be inclusive.
> > Fine.  Personally, it doesn't matter to me if the PUG is inclusive or
not.
> > It's not like I've been submitting photos for the past 10 years to it.
> > :)  But if it's not going to be inclusive, I want some snow themes,
> > dang it.  *L*
> >
> > P.S. If anyone has any reasons why the lens-specific themes are not
> > exclusionary, I'd love to hear it.  But please, no more "life is
> > unfair" responses that don't address the issue.
> >
> > chris
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
> >
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to