Noting modest about those lenses. They are all excellent IMO.

And ofcourse - Wlcom back Jeremy.
If you buy a Pentax DSLR you will help making Pentax competitive in the DSLR
market!

The *ist D is worth every cent of it's price, IMO.
I bet the *ist Ds will be too.
Jens

Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. september 2004 23:45
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Pentax into the future



Hi everyone,

I have enjoyed the PDML on and off for the last 3 years (though mostly off
for
the last year).

I have been using Pentax cameras, since my first purchase 4 years ago. I
started
with an ME Super, and then graduated to a PZ-1 because I really wanted AF (i
have kids) and DOF preview. I have a nice little set of modest lenses ...
the
50mm Pentax M, the 28-70 FA 4.0, and a 70-210 F.

I absolutely love my Pentax and equipment.

Having recently decided to make my first step into the DSLR market however,
I am
concerned about Pentax's ability to remian competitive in the digital market
in
the long term picture. Money does not flow freely for me, and investing in a
DSLR will be a very significant investment (although I suppose this is the
case
for most of us).

While I yearn for nothing more than to remain a true Pentax user, I am
worried
going for their DSLR might be a mistake. Is it time to consider  converting
to
one of the "others" ? Is there any consensus on whether or not Pentax can
continue to keep up?

I suppose this might be a tough question to answer, but I figured what
better
place to find out than the PDML.

If this has been a common topic of discussion, I would appreciate being
pointed
in the direction of specific archive posts that I may find useful.

Thanks in advance


Jeremy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to