If it doesn't you can always create your own.
They're quite simple to use:
1. Set shutter speed to x.
2. Focus.
3. Read distance.
4. Cross reference distance to f stop and ISO.
5. Set f stop.
Which seems like a lot of steps but once you get used to it they happen very fast.
The exposure doesn't have to be perfect, only within 1/2 stop or so.
Paul Stregevsky wrote:
How much harder is a nondedicated, non-TTL flash to use than a dedicated TTL flash? I'm looking at the flash instructions for my Ricoh XR-2s (Sears KS Auto), and it looks like a lot of work. I can't use aperture priority exposure; rather, I must select a shutter speed, divide the distance into the guide number, and use the quotient as my aperture--only if my flash is on "full" (I assume).
If I change my subject distance, I must change the aperture.
Sounds like a lot of work!
Which attribute would go further to simplify the routine: a flash that's dedicated but not TTL? Or TTL vs. merely dedicated?
Does anyone here still use a nondedicated flash? If so, why? Paul Stregevsky
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke
