Sure, the good old AUTO flash is nice, and sometimes better than TTL. For daylight fill-flash, just set the lens aperture 2 stops slower than the flash suggested. For instance, f2.8 on flash, lens at f5.6.

Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan

How much harder is a nondedicated, non-TTL flash to use than a dedicated TTL
flash? I'm looking at the flash instructions for my Ricoh XR-2s (Sears KS
Auto), and it looks like a lot of work. I can't use aperture priority
exposure; rather, I must select a shutter speed, divide the distance into
the guide number, and use the quotient as my aperture--only if my flash is
on "full" (I assume).


If I change my subject distance, I must change the aperture.

Sounds like a lot of work!

Which attribute would go further to simplify the routine: a flash that's
dedicated but not TTL? Or TTL vs. merely dedicated?

Does anyone here still use a nondedicated flash? If so, why?
Paul Stregevsky

_________________________________________________________________
Take advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented Microsoft� SmartScreen Technology. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN� Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*.




Reply via email to