On 14 Oct 2004 at 9:08, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > So, while one saves a few bucks on film, much more time can be spent > editing and correcting the work. Then, really, is there that much of a > savings (just talking about $$ v time, nothing to do with quality, etc.). > I can see this as being less of an issue for some bigshot pro who's billing a > high hourly or job rate, but for the average photog who's doing fewer and > smaller jobs per year, is the savings really that great?
If you have/learn to use the correct tools the best of the shoot can be very quickly sorted bringing you back to a conventionally manageable number of high quality images. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
