if you have to spend a lot of time hand tweaking each photo, you are spending too much time. i figure at most 20 minutes is all a photo i take is worth unless it's extraordinary. on average, i take about 5 minutes on one of my top shots of the day, and there are usually no more than 5-10 on a day's shooting of 50-100 shots.
Herb.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 12:08 PM Subject: Re: *ist D image quality-_Was -Stupid Question #999 > So, while one saves a few bucks on film, much more time can be spent > editing and correcting the work. Then, really, is there that much of a > savings (just talking about $$ v time, nothing to do with quality, etc.). > I can see this as being less of an issue for some bigshot pro who's billing > a high hourly or job rate, but for the average photog who's doing fewer and > smaller jobs per year, is the savings really that great?
