Right, Bill. Even if a very good scanner (better than my 3200 Epson) might get better quality from film, I still get the advantage of getting the pictures fast - and the chance to re-shooting my mistakes at once. Anyway, the digital shots are "good enough" for my purpose - so why waste time on money on film, developing and scanning? I will, however, occationally shoot slides with my three remaining manua� focus Pentax bodies. Jens
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 16. oktober 2004 17:26 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: De-Lurking and Replacement Decision ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jens Bladt" Subject: RE: De-Lurking and Replacement Decision >I can't resist saying, that I shot enough shots in just 5 weeks >(with my > *ist D) to pay for it - app. 5000 frames. 5000 shots on film would > equals > the ammont of film/delveloping, which represents the same value as > the *ist > D body! The question that needs to be asked though Jens, are you accepting quantity over quality? I am working on a project at the moment where I am happily taking this approach, but in my more typical shooting approach, this isn't my normal style. William Robb
