This is quite bizarre. There hasn't been any significant amount of political discussion relative to Shel's photo. Keith and I exchanged a few messages in regard to the homeless situation in some west-coast cities, but it sort of withered and died as it became obvious that we were close to agreement. The only vitriol that I have seen in regard to the photo has come from you. Apparently, you feel that you are qualified to determine what is appropriate and what is not. Based on your comments, I strongly disagree.
I have spoken to Shel on-list and off for quite a few years. I have never found him to have any ulterior motives in regard to his photography and the posting of the same. He is an artist, and he displays his work. Period. I think we've exhausted this topic. I won't comment again. I suggest others do the same. Paul > The other explanation would be that he is dumb, which isn't the case. > > Cotty wrote: > > > On 18/10/04, Caveman, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > > > >>Except you don't post them here with the intention of starting a > >>social/political debate. > > > > > > This is true, but do you honestly believe that Shel posts such pics to > > start such debates? Maybe I am being naive? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > Cotty > > > > > > ___/\__ > > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > > _____________________________ > > > > > > >
